Football Blog - Independent Football Writing
Football Blog
Home » Arsenal, English Football

Have Arsenal Become a Feeder Club?

17 July 2012 by

What is a Feeder Club? A feeder club is defined as a “team or club whose role is to provide experience and training for young players, with an agreement that any successful players can move on to a higher level at a given point. Now with that being the case, ‘Let me ask you one Question what do Marc Overmars, Emmanuel Petit, Thierry Henry and Cesc Fabregas all have in common? the answer seems pretty obvious they all played for Arsenal Football club at one point in their respective careers, I mean who wouldn’t want to play for Arsenal?  they have won the F.A Premier League (formerly known as the First Division) thirteen times, they regularly compete in the Champion League every year, the Emirates Staduim is a first class venue, and the Club has a rich Heritage and History with icons such as first Herbert Chapman and currently Arsene Wenger changing the philosophy and making Arsenal into a more attractive team to watch.

Remember at the beginning I posed the Question What do Marc Overmars, Emmanuel Petit, Thierry Henry and Cesc Fabregas have in common? Well they all have two things in common  1. those four players were sold to other teams 2. the other team happened to be Barcelona. Now I understand that Football, especially in the modern day is Big Business it has come a long way from its humble beginnings, players have agents, clubs have to think about their marketing appeal, sponsorship money, TV rights etc however my question is how can a club like Arsenal claim to be a big club if it consistently and continually keeps selling its best players?

Big clubs do not sell their star players, example last season Wayne Rooney dropped a bombshell on Manchester United by announcing his intentions to leave the club; now Manchester United were faced with two options, do they sell Rooney and make a lot of profit  but make one of their rivals stronger? or do they keep him and cave in to his demands? in the end they made the right decision and a few days later Rooney performed a u-turn and announced that he was signing a new contract.  Although Manchester United’s debt has been well documented, they do not sell their best players unless  Sir Alex has a ready made replacement examples of this include Cristiano Ronaldo replacing David Beckham, Nani replacing Ronaldo.

This unfortunately cannot be said about Arsenal, every year the same rumours surface. Last year it was the whole Cesc Fabregas will he won’t he? saga and this year its Robin Van Persie refusing to sign a new contract which has fueled speculation that he will be leaving the club.

This baffles me as an Arsenal supporter. How can Arsenal compete against the best teams if they  are continually selling  top players to  rival teams? For a club like Arsenal, Champions League participation should be a minimum requirement, Arsenal should be looking to win the Competition and compete against the best teams Manchester United, City on the domestic front, instead they are competing for fourth place with the likes of Tottenham and Newcastle. Where did it all go wrong?

Moreover I understand that in football just as in business you have to spend within your means, and one thing that I like Arsenal for is they are a self-sustaining club and they or rather Arsene Wenger places a large emphasis on nurturing young players and turning them into the stars of tomorrow. As good as that is, my whole issue is once these players reach that level then why are they sold? It is like a merry-go-round where is the clubs ambition? What kind of message does that send to not only their rivals but other players within the squad?

With UEFA Financial Fair Play concept being introduced, big spending clubs such as Manchester City and Real Madrid cannot go on wild spending sprees as we have been accustomed to seeing  in seasons gone by, from my understanding  this  means  that clubs have to make sure their finances are in order before they can add to their squads, in some cases players have to be sold before new players can be brought in, at clubs like Man city squad players are being sold in order to free up the wage bill and make room for new acquisitions.  So far Arsenal have brought Olivier Giroud from Montpellier and Lukas Podolski from Cologne, it seems like Wenger and the Arsenal Board have finally listened to the fans and started doing the right thing, facts do not lie Arsenal have not won a trophy since 2005, and the reason why is that their best players have been sold to other teams and they do not have ready made replacements to fill their boots.

So to answer the Question Have Arsenal Become a Feeder Club? In my opinion yes they have because you can’t keep selling your top players to your rivals and still expect to challenge for honours, furthermore by not winning anything for eight seasons and counting this shows that Arsenal as a club lack ambition and drive and if a club lacks these two fundamental principles then how can they attract the very best players? We have to remember that footballers  want to be successful and win things, at the end of their careers they want to be able to look back at all the trophies and accolades they’ve won so that is why you find  top players will only go to clubs such as Barcelona, Real Madrid, and Manchester United etc because these clubs have a proven track record of success and are  ambitious and want to win things.


3 Comments »

  • stepanovs

    Your comment on Man Utd replacing players who leave and Arsenal not doing so doesn’t quite sit: Fabregas was replaced by Arteta and – facing the prospect of life after RVP – Wenger signed up Giroud and Podlski to provide extra firepower.

    In essence, I believe every club is a ‘seller’ club with the exception of the oily clubs: Manchester City etc. Football has become a game in which clubs are in a constant struggle to keep up with the un-sustainably rich and the way that these clubs distort the wage and transfer systems within the game. This struggle continues until they inevitably face financial ruin or, as you pointed out, are forced to sell their best players to keep themselves afloat.

    The actions of Rangers – albeit on a smaller scale – can be taken as a run-through of what will inevitably happen mass-scale in the game if clubs don’t stop spending beyond their means in the near future. Unfortunately, Football is an objective sport and, as long as the oil-rich continue to bloat the financial side of the game, clubs will continue to chase and damage themselves and the game in their pursuit of success and silverware.

    As an Arsenal fan, I would take our current situation over that of Man City; particularly with the prospect of financial fair play regulation and wage and transfer caps on the horizon. However, unless there is a massive shift in the short-sighted dogma and ethics of world football in the near future, there might not be a Premier League or La Liga to enjoy in a few decades time.

  • gerrard

    You seem to forget that it’s Arsenal who first paid the £100K wage to a footballer. The infamous Sol Campbell.

  • Jem

    I think you’ve chosen your examples somewhat poorly.

    Overmars was a big and profitable sale for Arsenal (then the biggest fee received by an English club) and Petit was rapidly approaching 30 when they both left for Catalunia in the summer of 2000. The proverbial voids they left were pretty ably filled by the likes of Ljungberg and Vieira.

    For what it’s worth, Henry was pushing 30 when he moved on too and Vieira too was possibly on the slide when Juve came waving wads of cash.

    The fascinating one for me is Ashley Cole.

    Until Cole, most of the world class Arsenal players of the Wenger era had given their best years (around 25-29) to the club. The heroes of Highbury that moved on were never more than back-ups at other major clubs or first teamers at with lesser clubs.

    Then Cole left for Chelsea. A lot of Arsenal fans are still a bit bitter about it, blaming financial greed as the motivator of his decision. But the other thing that drives a lot of footballers is winning stuff. Trophies. Medals.

    The simple fact is, six years on, we can look back at that decision and see that in terms of winning stuff, Ashley Cole made exactly the right choice.

    Since then, in no particular order : Flamini, Clichy, Fabregas, Nasri, Hleb, Adebayor… Van Persie? Walcott? Oxlade?

    The image of rats leaving a sinking ship is a cruel one to Arsenal fans and the to the club alike, but the truth is that as more and more world class stars slip away from Arsenal, there’s less and less incentive for the ones who are there or who develop there to stick around.

    It’s going to be a long, slow, climb back to the top for the Gunners, and it may involve falling further down to pick themselves up again.

Leave your response!

Please let us know what you think of this article and comment below, try and keep it clean and stay on topic.