Football Blog - Independent Football Writing
Football Blog
Home » English Football

Newcastle 2 Tottenham 1 – Post-Match Analysis

20 August 2012 by

Starting the new season at St James Park, Alan Pardew fielded nearly his best lineup, only without injured captain Coloccini. Cabaye, Ben Arfa, Demba Ba and Papiss Cisse were all cleared to play. Players demonstrated tonnes of confidence. Despite Cisse and Ba not at their fittest, the midfield performed admirably. Ben Arfa was the crafter, while Jonas excelled as the tireless soldier.

Nevertheless, there is still room for improvement in defence. James Perch was not put under enormous pressure, but fullbacks were crying for help. Jonas teamed up with David Santon to stall the runs by Lennon several times, with the only exception which led to Gareth Bale hitting the crossbar. Danny Simpson was forced to fight off Bale without much help from Ben Arfa, the projected right wing in the starting XI. Pardew needs to re-weight the balance of letting Ben Arfa get loose in offence and filling the void on the flanks in defence. The 4-3-3 he played in 2nd half is very threatening, but could be exposed by good wingers.

The high defence line rejuvenated in Tottenham‘s jersey, in a slightly altered fashion. Centrebacks were deeper than where AVB normally prefers, with everyone else roaming around the midfield line.  It was a significant improvement to Tottenham, as this lessens the chance of their shaky defence being exposed. The tactics were more effective with Sigurdsson starting in place of Van der Vaart, who only reported back from Netherlands duty.

Ben Arfa fouled by substitute Van der Vaart

Midfields were no short of energy, but the playmaking department was missing. Without a major distributor in central midfield, Lennon and Bale were often asked to do more than they should to start an attack from scratch. Jermain Defoe was very sharp, but he either had to, or preferred to work on his own. The passes were just lacking in the final third, which came from Modric, Van der Vaart, or even Adebayor last season. When Tottenham turned to Harry Kane for the final push, their desperation for a striker became more obvious. AVB still has a lot to work on before claiming his comeback season.

Brow-Raiser: Undoubtedly the start of William Gallas. Nobody would have imagined the 35-year-old would fit in the high defence line, but AVB needed some leadership on the field. His partnership with the solid Younes Kaboul did not disappoint the fans too much, but Demba Ba’s goal clearly stated he is in decline. When captain Dawson comes back fit, Gallas won’t be expected to feature as much as he used to.

What If Jenas came in for Livermore? Three Lions debutant Jake Livermore is a decent defensive midfielder. When it comes to attack, he is still relatively raw though. Jenas has only just come back from injuries, but his passing range was what Tottenham was missing in the game. With Sandro already there protecting the backline, was it possible to give Jenas 25-30 minutes of run-out when they were trailing?  Or maybe Huddlestone who was not on the bench? AVB might have gone a bit too conservative for a large part of the game.

Player of the Match:  It would have easily been gone to Ben Arfa for his match-winning contributions, but Jonas deserves recognition for his enormous work rate. Starting on the left flank, he spent his effort more on closing down Lennon. When Ben Arfa promoted to a more advanced role in 2nd half, Jonas covered even more ground to maintain the balance of the team. He was the invisible contributor to the victory.

Gutierrez (L) doubled up on Lennon, again

Flop of the Match: There were clearly high hopes in Sigurdsson, which might have also over-stressed him. He did well in executing AVB’s defence plan. However, apart from the freekick, his long shots were far from threatening, as well as below-par passes. In his first appearance at a top-tier club, he seemed to have gradually lost the confidence as time went by. Surely not the ideal debut for the Icelandic midfielder.


5 Comments »

  • dust

    I know most Spurs fans have a love affair with Benny but he was terrible and has been for a while, Gallas was too!
    I have a couple of thoughts on how to remedy our situation.

    2 scenarios first a 4-3-3
    I hope AVB thinks about putting Jan at left back, Caulker in the middle with Kabul and leave walker out right. Jake should sit for a bit, Sandro is twice the player jake is and then some. Put Sig as the playmaker in the middle with bale out Left, lennon (or maybe a newly acquired Adam Johnson) out right with VDV just behind Defoe and Kane.

    Or… ideally a 3-2-3-2.

    GK —Freidal
    Def—Jan, Kaboul, Caulker
    Holding Mid field—Sandro, in front of Sandro to his left Siguardson
    Attacking Midfield Wingers— Walker, VDV/Falque, Bale,
    Upfront taget men— Defoe, Kane/another striker.

  • Porciestreet

    What would really make my week now would be for Manure and their newest addition to get stuffed tonight, and to see the supersillious grin rubbed off the face of Eamonn Holmes . Having to listen to his arrogance broadcast to the nation is sickly. Anyone notice he manages to be ill the day after manure lose. ? One can only dream.!

  • thelinesman (author)

    Hi Dust,

    You got a point about Benny. I previously wrote an article about he is one of the overrated left back in Premier League, but as you said, he is a fan favourite.

    Your 4-3-3 will be a typical formation when Tottenham plays at home. AVB might have gone for safety first in his first game in charge, but he has neglected the fact that the strongest asset of Tottenham is in attack.

  • dust

    @ thelinesman,

    What do you think of the 3-2-3-2 with Walker being moved up to right wing?

  • thelinesman (author)

    3-2-3-2 will be a very dangerous formation for the Tottenham now, especially when Kaboul and Caulker are neither quick nor have played in a three man defence system before. Having said that, it could be an alternative formation to go to when Tottenham is trailing late in the game. Sometimes, a change in formation could be more useful than direct substitutions to the existing formation.

Leave your response!

Please let us know what you think of this article and comment below, try and keep it clean and stay on topic.