<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should the Dundee clubs share grounds?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://footballblog.co.uk/should-the-dundee-clubs-share-grounds.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://footballblog.co.uk/should-the-dundee-clubs-share-grounds.html</link>
	<description>View From The Stands</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:40:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lewis</title>
		<link>http://footballblog.co.uk/should-the-dundee-clubs-share-grounds.html/comment-page-1#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footballblog.co.uk/?p=1390#comment-216</guid>
		<description>i think united and dundee shold both join clubs as 1 and be called dundee united city and build a completely different stadium somwhere else in dundee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think united and dundee shold both join clubs as 1 and be called dundee united city and build a completely different stadium somwhere else in dundee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Challenge Feedback</title>
		<link>http://footballblog.co.uk/should-the-dundee-clubs-share-grounds.html/comment-page-1#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Challenge Feedback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footballblog.co.uk/?p=1390#comment-127</guid>
		<description>A more imaginative title would have earned you more points
Article length was bang on when you exclude the quotes.
oppertunities &gt; opportunities
Was a very interesting read and you showed it was a topic you were interested in, it was a shame you slipped out of journalist mode and in to fan mode at points, if you read it through again hopefully you will see where I mean.
Good use of the quote, the images were also excellent, could have just done with a caption.
Think it just missed an analysis of whether the fans could eventually be persuaded that it was a good idea, or a quote from the fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A more imaginative title would have earned you more points<br />
Article length was bang on when you exclude the quotes.<br />
oppertunities &gt; opportunities<br />
Was a very interesting read and you showed it was a topic you were interested in, it was a shame you slipped out of journalist mode and in to fan mode at points, if you read it through again hopefully you will see where I mean.<br />
Good use of the quote, the images were also excellent, could have just done with a caption.<br />
Think it just missed an analysis of whether the fans could eventually be persuaded that it was a good idea, or a quote from the fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
