Football Blog - Independent Football Writing
Football Blog
Home » English Football, Featured, West Bromwich Albion, World Football

Why West Bromwich Albion should be wary of Nicolas Anelka

5 July 2013 by

With the deal having now been confirmed with Nicolas Anelka being pictured outside the Hawthorns with a West Bromwich Albion shirt it appears as though Steve Clarke is attempting to rebuild his strike force which has been left decimated by departures thus far this summer. With Romelu Lukaku returning to Chelsea after his hugely successful loan campaign with West Brom during which the Belgian registering seventeen League goals and Peter Odemwingie expected to be forced out of the club following his post-Christmas exile as a result of his desire to move to Queens Park Rangers, West Brom are in need of a brand new strike force with Steve Clarke desperate to avoid placing too much pressure on Shane Long.

Nicolas Anelka, now thirty four years old and a free agent following the cancellation of his contract with Chinese club Shanghai Shenhua is the first addition to the Baggies’ attacking line-up this summer however the jubilation this move has been greeted with by Albion supporters on social networking sites, I fear may be slightly premature and ill-advised.  You never quite know what you’re going to get with Nicolas Anelka, his career looked all but in tatters when the Frenchman pitched up at Bolton Wanderers in 2006 however a fantastic spell at the Reebok earned him a surprise move to Chelsea where we saw both the best and worst of Anelka.

Consistency is not one of Anelka’s strong points with the Frenchman having the canny ability to put in an outstanding performance one weekend and then somehow follow it up with a disastrous display the week after, make no mistake however that when Anelka is on form there is very little you can do defensively to stop him. Whilst the pace is no longer what it once was way back in Anelka’s prime the knowledge of when to time runs in behind is as sharp and as useful as ever before with it being unfortunate that Anelka didn’t get more game time in his six month loan spell in Turin with Italian giants Juventus last season.

In terms of quality then there is little you can say negatively about Steve Clarke’s decision to bring Anelka into the club with the former Arsenal man offering not just a boost in quality to West Brom’s dwindling forward line but more importantly in the short term, a boost in depth following the departure of Lukaku. Anelka will not replace the seventeen goals scored by Lukaku last season, simply because I don’t think he will get the game time required to do so but he will offer an option coming off the bench for the last twenty or so minutes in games. West Bromwich supporters cant, at this stage of his career expect and indeed hope for any more than that.

What is also worth a mention is Anelka’s well known ‘attitude’ when things aren’t going his way at a football club, nicknamed ‘Le Incredible Sulk’ after a number of incidents within the French national team set-up, Anelka was most recently caught up in controversy in China when the French striker refused to bow to travelling away supporters causing an altercation with one particular supporter who took exception to this. Furthermore who can forget the infamous French trip to South Africa for the 2010 World Cup where Anelka was sent home in disgrace following a heated altercation with the then struggling boss Raymond Domenech and what is to say a similar sort of thing won’t occur at West Brom should Anelka not be receiving the treatment he feels he deserves?

Steve Clarke is known to be a strict disciplinarian as a coach with the former Chelsea coach being respected for his firm but fair approach to his players, Clarke was tested significantly this past season by one individual in particular and that was Peter Odemwingie, who after an initially positive start to the season on the pitch with a goal in the season opener against Liverpool, made it publicly clear he wanted to leave the Midlands club to join Queens Park Rangers despite the Baggies significantly higher league position.

The frequent requests to leave the club were denied stringently by Clarke and eventually this forced Odemwingie’s hand with the Nigerian forward pitching up at Queens Park Rangers’ training ground on transfer deadline day in January only to be asked to leave by QPR officials leading to a sulking Nigerian forward sitting in the Loftus Road car park for the remainder of the transfer window. Whilst Albion kept their player, Odemwingie was essentially exiled for the remainder of the season with supporters booing him when used as an infrequent substitute.

Whilst Steve Clarke handled this situation as best he could there was no doubt West Bromwich Albion were a weaker side without Odemwingie and were at a disadvantage not having him at the forefront of their attack which was proven by West Brom’s record of registering just four League wins after their Boxing Day victory over Queens Park Rangers which ultimately cost Steve Clarke’s side in their ambition to qualify for the 2013-2014 edition of the Europa League.  Now the same scenario that occurred with Odemwingie could quite easily occur with Nicolas Anelka and the worrying thing for me is that with Anelka it could come about as a result of the most miniscule detail as we saw with the aforementioned clash with a Shanghai Shenhua support over his refusal to bow to supporters.

At this stage of his career Nicolas Anelka is not and should not be used as a Premier League team’s main striker and it is likely that Steve Clarke will be aware of this and use the Frenchman accordingly with regards to his age and fellow strikers at the club however what worries me is whether or not Anelka is willing to accept this? Will the Nicolas Anelka returning to the Premier League with West Brom be the same headstrong Nicolas Anelka who has often forced himself out of clubs as a result of his behaviour and attitude and if the answer is yes, then the West Bromwich Albion supporters overcome with glee at today’s signing are in for a rocky few months with Nicolas Anelka at the club.

Follow Chris Winterburn on Twitter @Chriswin4

 

(Visited 1,987 times, 1 visits today)

3 Comments »

  • Darren Bradley drives Peugeot

    I think there have been a couple of suppositions thrown into this article as semi-fact intended to strengthen the argument of the author.

    Anelka is inconsistent- He’s scored goals and been a relative success at almost every club he’s played at. If by being inconsistent you mean averaging better than a goal every 3 games in England, then maybe yes, he is.

    He’ll only get 20 minutes here and there- I’m not sure, knowing this Albion Board as us fans do, that they’d commit to a £2.6m wage liability without thoroughly checking out Anelka’s fitness beforehand. By our own admission we have finite resources this summer and many positions to fill, I’d wager that we won’t be frittering money about on players who can make a 20-minute impact. Frank Lampard is 35, is he only capable of 20-minute cameos?

    He fell out with Raymond Domenech- who didn’t?

    Clarke refused Odemwingie’s requests to leave- Steve Clarke has no dealings with transfers, that’s the job of the Sporting and Technical Director, who at the time was Dan Ashworth. I have it on reasonably good authority that Odemwingie asked to leave, Clarke didn’t want him to and told Ashworth this, Albion then refused, Odemwingie spat his dummy out and forced our hand by tweeting, but nobody met the asking price. Odemwingie himself cited issues with Roy Hodgson and the club’s hierarchy and not Clarke. This is the first article I’ve read in a year that’s described Clarke as a disciplinarian, perhaps you know something we don’t.

    We’re each entitled to our opinion and this is a well-written article, but I do feel there’s a lot of opinion included as fact. We’ll see over the coming months if you’re right or not.

  • Chris Winterburn (author)

    I think I may have portrayed Steve Clarke maybe as too much of a disciplinarian but that said Odemwingie was given very few chances after January.

    Anelka’s fitness wont be up the Premier League standard after a spell in China and then only making three appearances for Juventus I think that will need a pre-season to sort out.

    I don’t think at this stage of his career he can be asked to be a main frontman that a lot of Albion supporters I have spoken to think he will be however I could be proven wrong on that.

    You cant deny he is a difficult player to handle, he has had issues at most clubs he has been at, that’s well documented. Steve Clarke might get him spot on but if he doesn’t that’s when problems could occur.

    Thank you for the feedback though, appreciate people informing me of their views.

  • Darren Bradley drives Peugeot

    Odemwingie was given few opportunities after January but I’d suggest they were to do with his incessant tweeting and being disciplined by the club (not specifically Clarke) and then the issues with the fans than they were symptomatic of a problem between he and Clarke. Furthermore Clarke was quoted several times as saying he’d continue to pick Odemwingie because he’s a very good footballer. I think politics dictated otherwise.

    You could argue that almost every footballer’s fitness won’t be up to Premier League standard after a month in Marbella.

    I agree that he probably won’t play 38 games a season, but neither did Lukaku, he barely started a game before Christmas. The burden will probably fall between Anelka, Long and whoever else we sign, which as you allude to, probably suits him.

    I’m not sure he is that difficult, 10 clubs and how many fall-outs?? I don’t recall that many. It seems to have become almost an urban myth after the Le Sulk saga. I could be very wrong, we’ll see I guess!!

Leave your response!

Please let us know what you think of this article and comment below, try and keep it clean and stay on topic.