Chelsea look brilliant under Enzo Maresca – but how close are they to being real Premier League title contenders? A tactical and cultural deep dive.
Chelsea absolutely dismantled Tottenham away from home last Saturday – which is not often something you’d say about a 1–0 win – and it might make you believe they’re closer than ever to being real Premier League title contenders.
But then, if you watched the Sunderland game just a week before, you’ll know exactly why they’re not.
Chelsea’s Tactical Masterclass Against Tottenham
Against Tottenham, Chelsea were unrecognisably sharp. They had a plan, they executed it, and they bullied a team away from home in a London derby – a team who could’ve potentially gone up to second.
Enzo Maresca’s side didn’t just play well – they dismantled Spurs, mainly due to one of the most coherent pressing structures we’ve seen from them all season.
As Jamie Carragher pointed out on Monday Night Football, Tottenham’s midfield pairing of Joao Palhinha and Rodrigo Bentancur might look solid on paper, but together they aren’t proactive enough on the ball.
Spurs can’t pass through a block and they can’t play through a press, and Chelsea turned up determined to exploit exactly that.
From kick-off, Chelsea went man-to-man in their press, leaving Kevin Danso as the free man deliberately – a tactical insult, really. It must be strange being a Premier League-level centre-back being told, “go on then, you have it.”
But Maresca’s read was right: Danso’s passing was nervous, sideways, and panicked. Chelsea let him receive it, then rushed him. He was booked early in the second half for losing the ball under pressure and was hooked after an hour – something you rarely see for a centre-back.
This was a deliberate trap. Chelsea won the ball 41 times in what @markrstats would class as “danger zones” – that’s almost once every two minutes, away from home. That’s absurd. And from those turnovers alone, they generated five chances, compared to Tottenham’s three match attempts in total.
Spurs lost possession in "buildup area" 41 times tonight – their worst figure this season. In the second half, their pass completion rate fell to 67% pic.twitter.com/Rjl3C16CDh
— markstats (@markrstats) November 1, 2025
The winning goal summed it all up: a chain of turnovers, pressure after pressure, and eventually Moises Caicedo nicking it high before Chelsea broke through. Spurs didn’t just lose the ball – they lost their nerve.
Chelsea’s High Press Under Enzo Maresca
If you’re going to play out from the back, arguably the last team you want to do it against is Chelsea under Maresca.
Chelsea are now among the best in the Premier League for turning high turnovers into shots, according to Opta. Only Leeds have a higher conversion rate – but unlike Leeds, Chelsea have actually scored from them. Twice.
| Team | Total High Turnovers | Shots from High Turnovers | Goals from High Turnovers | % Ending in Shot |
| Leeds | 61 | 17 | 0 | 27.87 |
| Chelsea | 67 | 16 | 2 | 23.88 |
| Liverpool | 61 | 14 | 3 | 22.95 |
| Brighton | 88 | 20 | 2 | 22.73 |
| Man City | 72 | 15 | 0 | 20.83 |
| Bournemouth | 80 | 15 | 2 | 18.75 |
| Fulham | 43 | 8 | 0 | 18.61 |
| Aston Villa | 54 | 10 | 1 | 18.52 |
| Sunderland | 54 | 10 | 0 | 18.52 |
| Crystal Palace | 45 | 8 | 0 | 17.78 |
| West Ham | 49 | 8 | 0 | 16.33 |
| Brentford | 64 | 10 | 1 | 15.63 |
| Newcastle | 73 | 11 | 1 | 15.07 |
| Wolves | 67 | 9 | 1 | 13.43 |
| Burnley | 45 | 6 | 2 | 13.33 |
| Nottm Forest | 61 | 7 | 0 | 11.47 |
| Man Utd | 67 | 7 | 2 | 10.45 |
| Everton | 68 | 7 | 2 | 10.29 |
| Arsenal | 66 | 4 | 1 | 6.06 |
| Spurs | 51 | 1 | 0 | 1.96 |
And then there’s Caicedo. The Ecuadorian isn’t just “good” at winning the ball – he’s top in the league among midfielders for possession wins in the final third and top for total ball recoveries anywhere on the pitch.

Moises Caicedo’s defensive actions performance as a percentile compared to midfielders in the Premier League 2025/26 season. Nobody has more tackles in the attacking third and nobody has more interceptions. Chart via FBref.
He won possession 14 times against Spurs. That is ridiculous output for a single game.
And this isn’t luck; it’s structure. It’s a sign that Chelsea’s off-ball work – something Maresca has been obsessive about since arriving – is clicking in a way that makes them genuinely hard to play against.
Reece James in Midfield
Starting Reece James in central midfield was quietly one of Maresca’s smartest tweaks. He was everywhere. His physicality meant he couldn’t be bullied; his passing range meant he could escape pressure; and his defensive positioning made Chelsea’s counter-press almost airtight.
When Tottenham tried to press high, Robert Sanchez went long – and when that happened, James pushed the entire midfield unit forward to hunt second balls.
That might sound small, but it kept Spurs hemmed in. And most of James’ defensive actions came in the Tottenham half, which tells you everything about how high Chelsea were playing and how confidently they were defending.
If Reece James could stay fit for 50 games a season, we’d be talking about him as one of the best all-round footballers in the world. That’s not hyperbole. He’s got everything: technical ability, composure, aggression, leadership. He’s the prototype of what Maresca wants Chelsea to be.
Are Chelsea Title Contenders?
So why is it then that Chelsea can’t win the league? That’s the million-pound question. Because when Chelsea are this good, they look capable of beating anyone.
The tactical structure is clear, the coaching is elite, and the talent pool is enormous. But then, there’s the Sunderland defeat. There’s the draw to Brentford. There are the stupid red cards that make you want to close your laptop.
Chelsea’s problem isn’t quality; it’s consistency. And that consistency gap, right now, is cultural.
This is the youngest squad in the Premier League by an entire year (FBref). When they’re flying, they look like world-beaters. But when something goes wrong, experience – or the lack of it – shows.
Take Sunderland’s winner: a simple transition that became a 3v3 because half the Chelsea team didn’t sprint back.
Contrast that with Arsenal, who in stoppage time of a game they were already winning 2–0 against Burnley, still had every player bursting back into position.
It's commitment like this that gets you eight clean sheets in a row!
⛔️ @Arsenal pic.twitter.com/vwVyxE9mSc
— Premier League (@premierleague) November 5, 2025
That’s not tactics. That’s culture. And culture is the thing that still separates Chelsea from the genuine title challengers.
What Are Chelsea Missing?
The mistakes are starting to feel familiar: disciplinary issues, red cards, emotional reactions, players losing focus at crucial moments. Liam Delap’s needless two yellow cards having just returned from injury, Malo Gusto’s red in stoppage time – these are the things that cost you titles.
You can’t coach experience, but you can grow it.
And until someone in this young squad steps into that true leadership role – someone who drags standards up and refuses to let the energy drop – Chelsea will continue to hover just below the elite.
The tactics are there. The squad depth is there. The manager might well be the real deal. But until the mentality matches the system, Chelsea will remain a brilliantly built team that still can’t quite be trusted.
Verdict: Can Chelsea Win The Premier League?
Right now, Chelsea feel like a title-contending team in disguise.
Their tactical blueprint is ready. They can dominate top sides away from home. They’ve solved structural problems that used to cripple them. But they still lack the emotional discipline and leadership needed to churn out wins every week.
Fix that, and they’re in the conversation. Until then, they’re the best “not quite” team in the league.
